Submission Evaluation Criteria
EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR PAPERS OTHER THAN ORIGINAL RESEARCH*
*Field Practices and Experiences, Policy Assessments, and Assessments Related to the Congress Themes
1
Has the importance of the subject in terms of emergency aid and disaster management been explained?
o No (0 points)
o Partially (5 points)
o Yes (10 points)
2
Has the current literature on national and/or international practices related to the subject been reviewed?
o No (0 points)
o Partially (5 points)
o Yes (10 points)
3
Has the historical process on the subject been evaluated?
o No (0 points)
o Partially (5 points)
o Yes (10 points)
4
Have the parties or institutions related to the subject been defined or evaluated?
o No (0 points)
o Partially (5 points)
o Yes (10 points)
5
Have the evaluations on the subject been sufficiently discussed?
o No (0 points)
o Partially (5 points)
o Yes (10 points)
6
Are solution suggestions and/or research requirements related to the subject specified?
o No (0 points)
o Partially (5 points)
o Yes (10 points)
7
Is the subject important in terms of emergency aid and disaster management?
o No (0 points)
o Partially (5 points)
o Yes (10 points)
8
Does the paper have the value of being presented and discussed at the congress?
o No (0 points)
o Partially (5 points)
o Yes (10 points)